Category: law entrance coaching

Introduction

Ever stumbled upon a Latin phrase in a legal document and felt utterly bamboozled? Fear not! You’re about to embark on an enlightening journey through some of the most pivotal legal Latin terms and phrases that pepper the language of the law. From the get-go (“Ab Initio”), we’ll decode these phrases, providing you with a handy guide to not only impress your friends but also to grasp the intricate ballet of legal principles these terms dance to. Whether you’re a legal eagle, a curious cat, or someone in between, there’s something here for everyone. Ready to dive in?

From “Ab Initio” to “Ignorantia Juris Non-Excusat”: Deciphering Legal Latin

Ab Initio – From the Beginning

Starting off, “Ab Initio” sets the stage for understanding legal scenarios from their inception. This phrase isn’t just about time; it’s about legitimacy from the start. Whether a contract or a law, if something’s wrong “Ab Initio,” it’s as if it never existed.

Actionable Per Se – The Act Itself is Punishable

Some actions are so egregious that the law doesn’t require proof of damage. “Actionable Per Se” covers acts where the mere doing is enough to ring the legal alarm bells. Think defamation or trespassing; the act alone is enough to warrant a wag of the legal finger.

Actio Personalis Moritur Cum Persona – Personal Rights Die With the Person

This melancholic maxim reminds us that some legal actions are so personal, they expire with the individual. If someone had a claim for personal damages, that claim typically vanishes into the ether once they pass away.

Actori Incumbit Onus Probandi – The Plaintiff Bears the Burden of Proof

In the legal tango, the one who accuses (the plaintiff) must lead. “Actori Incumbit Onus Probandi” is the principle that if you’re claiming something in court, you better have the evidence to back it up.

Actus Me Invito Factus Non Est Meus Actus – An Act Done Against My Will Is Not My Act

Ever been coerced into doing something? The law gets it. This principle protects individuals by stating that actions performed under duress aren’t considered willingly done by them.

Actus Non Facit Reum Nisi Mens Sit Rea – An Act Does Not Make One Guilty Unless the Mind Is Guilty

The cornerstone of criminal law, this phrase separates the naughty from the nice. It’s not enough to just do something illegal; you have to have intended to break the law too.

Actus Reus – Guilty Act

Speaking of naughty, “Actus Reus” refers to the act of wrongdoing itself. It’s one half of the dynamic duo required to convict someone of a crime, the other being “Mens Rea” (a guilty mind).

Ad Hoc – For This Specific Purpose

Ever been on a committee formed to tackle just one particular issue? Then you’ve been part of something “Ad Hoc.” It’s all about creating solutions for a specific problem, not general ones.

Alibi – Elsewhere

The classic defense. “I couldn’t have done it; I was elsewhere!” Having an “Alibi” means you have evidence to prove you were in a different place when the deed was done, making it impossible (or at least, highly unlikely) for you to be the perpetrator.

Amicus Curiae – A Friend of the Court

Not all heroes wear capes; some file briefs. “Amicus Curiae” refers to someone not a party to the case who offers information or expertise to help the court. Think of them as the helpful neighbor in the world of law.

Ante Litem Motam – Before a Lawsuit is Brought

Before the storm comes the calm. “Ante Litem Motam” refers to actions or circumstances occurring before any legal action is initiated. It’s often pertinent in determining the conditions or agreements that existed before disputes led to litigation.

Assentio Mentium – The Meeting of Minds

At the heart of every contract is the “Assentio Mentium,” the mutual understanding and agreement between parties. This meeting of the minds is crucial; without it, no true agreement exists, no matter what’s written on paper.

Audi Alteram Partem – No One Shall Be Condemned Unheard

Fairness 101: “Audi Alteram Partem” ensures that everyone gets a chance to tell their side of the story before a decision is made. It’s a fundamental principle of justice, ensuring that courts or any decision-making bodies hear all parties before reaching a conclusion.

Bona Fide – In Good Faith

Whether in deals, contracts, or relationships, acting “Bona Fide” means you’re doing it with honest intentions, without any intent to deceive. It’s the legal world’s version of playing fair.

Bona Vacantia – Ownerless Goods

Ever wonder what happens to assets without an owner? Enter “Bona Vacantia,” the term for goods that have no rightful owner. These can range from unclaimed estates to company assets when a business dissolves without heirs or owners.

Boni Judicis Est Ampliare Jurisdictionem – A Good Judge’s Duty is to Extend Their Jurisdiction

This principle speaks to the proactive role of judges in ensuring justice is served, suggesting that a good judge seeks to understand and apply their authority fully in the pursuit of fairness and resolution.

Caveat Emptor – Let the Buyer Beware

A timeless warning for consumers: “Caveat Emptor” places the onus on buyers to do their due diligence before making a purchase. It’s a call to arms (or, perhaps more aptly, to critical thinking) for anyone parting with their money.

Certiorari – To Be Informed of

When a higher court orders a lower court to deliver its record in a case so the higher court can review it, that’s a “Certiorari.” It’s a way of appealing to a higher power, asking for a second look to ensure justice is rightly served.

Caveat Venditor – Let the Seller Beware

The flip side of “Caveat Emptor,” this principle suggests that sellers also have responsibilities and can’t just pawn off anything on unsuspecting buyers. It’s increasingly relevant in consumer protection laws.

Communis Hostis Omnium – Common Enemy of All

Pirates, yes, pirates, originally embodied this term. “Communis Hostis Omnium” referred to those who are enemies of humanity as a whole, such as sea pirates. Today, it could apply to any universally recognized threat outside the bounds of national jurisdiction.

Corpus Delicti – The Body of the Crime

No, it’s not always about a literal body. “Corpus Delicti” refers to the objective proof that a crime has been committed. It’s the foundation upon which a criminal case is built, evidence that shows a crime has indeed taken place.

Crimen Trahit Personam – The Crime Carries the Person

This principle means that the criminal charges against a person can follow them, requiring them to face trial in the jurisdiction where the crime was committed. It emphasizes the inescapable nature of legal accountability.

Damnum Sine Injuria – Damage Without Legal Injury

Sometimes, harm doesn’t translate to a legal wrong. “Damnum Sine Injuria” covers those unfortunate situations where someone suffers a loss that the law doesn’t recognize as actionable. It’s a tough pill to swallow, but not every loss begets compensation.

De Facto – In Fact

Reality check: “De Facto” describes situations that exist in reality, even if not officially sanctioned. Think of a “de facto” leader who holds power without being formally recognized. It’s about what’s happening on the ground, legalities aside.

De Jure – By Law

On the flip side, “De Jure” refers to what’s recognized by law, even if the reality on the ground differs. It’s the legal world’s version of saying, “By the book.”

De Minimis Non Curat Lex – The Law Does Not Concern Itself With Trifles

This principle embodies the idea that the law isn’t interested in minor matters. It’s a reminder that the legal system is designed to address significant issues, ensuring that courts don’t get bogged down by inconsequential disputes.

De Novo – Anew

When a court hears a case “De Novo,” it’s considering it afresh, without regard for any previous decisions or findings. This approach is often applied in appeals where the appellate court reviews the case as if it were being heard for the first time.

Dictum – A Judge’s Additional Comment

“Dictum” refers to a statement or observation made by a judge in a court’s decision that goes beyond the necessary reasoning to reach a verdict. While interesting and potentially influential, these comments aren’t binding as legal precedent.

Doli Capax – Capable of Guilt

This term is used to describe someone who is considered legally capable of forming the intent to commit a crime, typically due to their age or mental capacity. It’s a critical factor in determining criminal responsibility.

Doli Incapax – Incapable of Guilt

Conversely, “Doli Incapax” refers to individuals (usually children under a certain age) presumed incapable of forming criminal intent. This legal principle protects young or mentally incapacitated individuals from being held to the same standards of culpability as fully capable adults.

Detinue – Wrongful Detention of Goods

“Detinue” is a tort action to recover personal property wrongfully taken or held by another. It emphasizes the right of individuals to regain possession of their goods when they have been unlawfully detained.

Donatio Mortis Causa – Gift in Contemplation of Death

This term describes a gift made by someone expecting to die soon. The gift becomes effective only upon their death, and it’s a way to pass on property outside of a will, under certain conditions.

Estoppel – Barred From Denying

“Estoppel” is a legal principle that prevents someone from arguing something contrary to a claim they’ve previously made or accepted in court. It’s about ensuring fairness and consistency in legal proceedings.

Ex Gratia – As a Favor

An “Ex Gratia” payment is made not because of any legal obligation but out of goodwill. It’s a way of resolving a dispute or acknowledging a claim where there’s no admission of liability.

Ex Officio – By Virtue of One’s Office

This term refers to the powers or duties that come with holding a particular office or position. “Ex Officio” actions are taken not by personal initiative but as a requirement of the role.

Ex Parte – On Behalf of One Side Only

An “Ex Parte” decision or action is taken by or for the benefit of one party without the presence or participation of the opposition. While necessary in certain urgent situations, it’s generally preferred that decisions are made with all parties present.

Ex Post Facto – After the Fact

Laws that apply retroactively, affecting actions that occurred before the law was in place, are described as “Ex Post Facto.” Generally frowned upon, these laws can alter the legal consequences of actions after they’ve been performed.

Falsus in Uno, Falsus in Omnibus – False in One Thing, False in Everything

This maxim suggests that if a witness lies about one aspect of their testimony, their entire testimony may be disregarded. It’s a warning against dishonesty and a reminder of the importance of credibility in legal proceedings.

Fatum – Fate

“Fatum” refers to the concept of fate or destiny. While not a legal principle per se, it’s occasionally referenced in philosophical discussions about law, justice, and the inevitability of certain outcomes.

Factum Probandum – The Fact to be Proved

This term identifies the specific fact or facts that must be established to prove a case in court. It’s the crux of the matter at hand, the cornerstone upon which legal arguments are built.

Factum Probans – The Fact Proving

Relatedly, “Factum Probans” refers to the evidence or facts that support or prove the “Factum Probandum.” It’s about the building blocks of proof that construct the argument in favor of a legal claim or defense.

Fraus Est Celare Fraudem – It Is a Fraud to Conceal a Fraud

This principle underlines the idea that hiding a fraud is in itself fraudulent. It speaks to the obligation to disclose wrongdoing, not just refrain from fraudulent acts.

Functus Officio – No Longer Having Power

Once a decision has been made or a task completed, the authority held by an individual or body to make that decision or perform that task is described as “Functus Officio” – they have fulfilled their duty and no longer hold power in that context.

Furiosi Nulla Voluntas Est – A Mentally Ill Person Has No Legal Will

This phrase addresses the capacity to make legal decisions or enter into agreements, stating that individuals who are mentally incapacitated cannot legally consent or make binding decisions.

Habeas Corpus – You Shall Have the Body

A fundamental legal instrument safeguarding individual freedom against arbitrary detention, “Habeas Corpus” is a court order demanding that a person detained be brought before a judge or into court. The purpose is to release someone from unlawful imprisonment.

Ignorantia Juris Non-Excusat – Ignorance of the Law Excuses Not

This principle underscores a foundational concept in legal systems worldwide: individuals are presumed to know the law, and claiming ignorance of the law is not a valid defense against liability. The rationale behind this principle is that laws are public records, accessible to all, and individuals have a responsibility to be aware of the legal frameworks within which they operate. It serves as a crucial mechanism for ensuring accountability and compliance with the law, reinforcing the idea that one cannot evade legal responsibility simply by claiming unawareness of the law’s existence or specifics.

For more informative blogs on Careers in Law, Click Here!!